City of Manhattan Beach
Home MenuLegislative Positions
Track the City Council's positions on various legislative items
Background
The Manhattan Beach City Council periodically reviews bills, initiatives, or legislation pending in other governmental agencies. The purpose of this is to outline the position of the City Council on priority issues and matters that impact the City’s ability to operate effectively, promote City interests, and protect local authority.
The following are legislative matters that the City Council has taken a position on. Included with each of the legislation listed is a link to the legislative matter, the City’s staff report to the City Council regarding the measure (if applicable), and letters to legislators communicating the City Council ’s official position on each bill, which is reflective of the position adopted by the City Council.
Legislative Platform
The Legislative Platform sets forth the City’s legislative objectives for the 2024 calendar year, provides direction for legislative action, and must be approved on an annual basis. The Platform contains broad policy statements pertaining to a variety of issues that impact the City of Manhattan Beach with a focus on local control.
Questions regarding the process for the City Council to consider specific legislation or the City Council’s position on legislative matters may be directed to Assistant to the City Manager, George Gabriel at (310) 802-5054.Page Last Updated: October 9, 2024
*Please note: Bills may be amended several times throughout the legislative cycle and their summaries may change during the process. The legislative summaries below reflect the intent of the bills at the time the City Council took a position and may become outdated if the bills are amended.
Positions Taken in 2024
Item Topic | Legislative Summary | Status |
City Council Position
|
Assembly Bill 1893 | The Planning and Zoning Law requires a city or county to adopt a general plan for land use development within its boundaries that includes, among other things, a housing element. Existing law, commonly referred to as the Housing Element Law, prescribes requirements for a city’s or county’s preparation of, and compliance with, its housing element, and requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to review and determine whether the housing element substantially complies with the Housing Element Law, as specified. Existing law, the Housing Accountability Act, among other things, prohibits a local agency from disapproving, or conditioning approval in a manner that renders infeasible, a housing development project for very low, low-, or moderate-income households unless the local agency makes written findings as to one of certain sets of conditions, as specified. Among these conditions, the act allows a local agency to disapprove a housing development project that is inconsistent with the jurisdiction’s zoning ordinances and general plan land use designation as it existed on the date the application was deemed complete, if the jurisdiction has adopted a revised housing element that is in substantial compliance with the Housing Element Law, as specified. This bill would make various changes to that condition. The bill would specify that a local agency may disapprove or condition approval of a housing development project or emergency shelter, as described above, if the local agency makes written findings that on the date the application for the housing development project or emergency shelter was deemed complete the jurisdiction did not have an adopted revised housing element that was in substantial compliance with the Housing Element Law and the housing development project is not a builder’s remedy project, as defined. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
SIGNED INTO LAW |
OPPOSE |
Assembly Bill 1082 | Existing law authorizes a peace officer, as defined, or a regularly employed and salaried employee, who is engaged in directing traffic or enforcing parking laws and regulations, of a city, county, or jurisdiction of a state agency in which a vehicle is located, to remove a vehicle located within the territorial limits in which the officer or employee may act, under designated circumstances, including, but not limited to, when a vehicle is found upon a highway or public land or removed pursuant to the Vehicle Code, and has been issued 5 or more notices of parking violations to which the owner or person in control of the vehicle has not responded within a designated time period. Under existing law, a vehicle that has been removed and impounded under those circumstances that is not released may be subject to a lien sale to compensate for the costs of towage and for caring for and keeping safe the vehicle. This bill would delete the authority of a peace officer or public employee, as appropriate, to remove a vehicle under these circumstances. The bill would delete the related authority to conduct a lien sale to cover towing and storage expenses, except as specified. The bill would make various conforming and technical changes. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. | FAILED IN CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE |
OPPOSE |
Senate Bill 450 | This bill would remove the requirement that a proposed housing development does not allow for the demolition of more than 25% of the existing exterior structural walls to be considered ministerially. The bill would prohibit a local agency from imposing objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards that do not apply uniformly to development within the underlying zone, but would specify that these provisions do not prohibit a local agency from adopting or imposing objective zoning standards, objective subdivision standards, and objective design standards on the development if the standards are more permissive than applicable standards within the underlying zone. The bill would remove the authorization for a local agency to deny a proposed housing development if the building official makes a written finding that the proposed housing development project would have a specific, adverse impact upon the physical environment. The bill would require the local agency to consider and approve or deny the proposed housing development application within 60 days from the date the local agency receives the completed application, and would deem the application approved after that time. The bill would require a permitting agency, if it denies an application, to provide a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied by the applicant. This bill contains other related provisions and other existing laws. |
SIGNED INTO LAW |
OPPOSE |
Assembly Bill 1778 | Establishes a “Marin Electric Bicycle Safety Pilot Program,” which authorizes a local authority within Marin County to adopt an ordinance or resolution that would prohibit a person under 16 years of age from operating a class 2 electric bicycle or require a person operating a class 2 bicycle to wear a bicycle helmet; and allows a violation of the ordinance or resolution to be an infraction punishable by either a $25 fine or completion of an electric bicycle safety and training program. |
SIGNED INTO LAW |
SUPPORT |
Assembly Bill 3093 | The Planning and Zoning Law requires a city or county to adopt a general plan for land use development that includes a housing element. That law defines various terms for purposes of requirements applicable to the housing element. Under current law, a housing element is required to include specified information, including an analysis of special housing needs, such as those of the elderly, and quantification of the locality’s existing and projected housing needs for all income levels, including extremely low income households, calculated as provided. This bill would define acutely low, extremely low, very low, lower, moderate, and above moderate income for purposes of requirements applicable to the housing element, and would make related changes. |
SIGNED INTO LAW |
OPPOSE |
Senate Bill 951 |
This bill would, for a jurisdiction within the coastal zone that has not identified adequate sites to accommodate the locality’s housing need for a designated income level, require completion of any necessary local coastal program amendments related to land use designations, changes in intensity of land use, zoning ordinances, or zoning district maps, as specified. (Note: SB 951 had been significantly amended and thus this summary is no longer accurate as of 10/4/24. The legislation signed into law no longer had impacts on the City) |
SIGNED INTO LAW |
OPPOSE |
Assembly Bill 2560 |
This bill would provide that, in the coastal zone, the Density Bonus Law does not relieve a project from the requirement to obtain a coastal development permit, as specified. The bill would require any density bonus, concessions, incentives, waivers or reductions of development standards, and parking ratios to which an applicant is entitled to be permitted in a manner that is consistent with the Density Bonus Law and does not result in significant adverse impacts to coastal resources and public coastal access, as specified. Existing law requires each local government within the coastal zone to prepare a local coastal program and specifies that a local coastal program is not required to include housing policies and programs. This bill would repeal that provision and instead require, on or by July 1, 2026, any local government in the coastal zone to submit an amendment to the local government’s local coastal program that harmonizes the Density Bonus Law and the California Coastal Act, as specified. The bill would require this amendment to be processed as de minimis, as specified, if certain conditions are met. By requiring local governments to submit an amendment to its local coastal program, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. |
FAILED IN CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE |
OPPOSE |
Senate Bill 1037 | Would allow the Attorney General to take legal action against a city and seek fines up to $50K a month for failure to adopt a compliant housing element or if the city does not follow state laws that require ministerial approval of certain housing projects. |
SIGNED INTO LAW |
OPPOSE |
Assembly Bill 2234 | Establishes a “San Diego Electric Bicycle Safety Pilot Program,” which authorizes a local authority within San Diego County to adopt an ordinance or resolution that would prohibit a person under 12 years of age from operating a class 1 or 2 electric bicycle; and allows a violation of the ordinance or resolution to be an infraction punishable by either a $25 fine or completion of an electric bicycle safety and training program. |
SIGNED INTO LAW |
SUPPORT |
Assembly Bill 1886 | Would remove a fundamental provision of housing element law that allows a city to disagree with the State Department of Housing and Community Development, explain why its housing element is in substantial compliance with the law, and then adopt the housing element which is thereafter considered “in substantial compliance with housing element law.” |
SIGNED INTO LAW |
OPPOSE |
Assembly Bill 2309 | Would remove the consent requirement and, instead, authorize the city attorney of any general law city or chartered city to prosecute any misdemeanor committed within the city arising out of violation of state law. |
FAILED IN CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE |
SUPPORT |
Measure MB | On November 15, 2023, the MBUSD Board of Trustees approved a resolution to place the, “Manhattan Beach Unified School District Quality Education Protection Measure,” on the March 5, 2024, ballot which would renew Measure MB Parcel Tax by extending it for another 6 years. | APPROVED BY VOTERS |
SUPPORT |
Positions Taken in 2023
Item Topic | Legislative Summary | Status |
City Council Position |
Assembly Bill 825 | AB 825 would bar a local authority from prohibiting the operation of a bicycle on a sidewalk adjacent to a highway corridor that does not include a bikeway. | VETOED BY GOVERNOR |
OPPOSED |
Assembly Bill 504 | Assembly Bill 504 would declare the acts of sympathy striking and honoring a picket line a human right. AB 504 would also void provisions in public employer policies or collective bargaining agreements limiting or preventing an employee's right to sympathy strike. | VETOED BY GOVERNOR |
OPPOSED BY MAYOR |
Assembly Constitutional Amendment 13 | ACA 13 would require future ballot measures that increase voter approval requirements to also pass by the same margin. It would also preserve the right of local governments to place advisory questions on the ballot asking voters their opinions on issues. |
SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 2024 BALLOT |
SUPPORT (Authorized on |
Senate Bill 43 | Would update California's 1967 conservatorship law by expanding the definition of "gravely disabled" to include conditions that result in a substantial risk of serious harm to an individual's physical or mental health. This includes the inability to seek medical care, adequate shelter, or self-protection and safety. Updating this definition better reflects the contemporary realities present in our communities, ensuring that individuals at risk of significant harm receive the help individuals may need. | SIGNED INTO LAW |
SUPPORT |
Senate Bill 363 | Would establish a real-time, internet-based dashboard to collect, aggregate, and display information about available beds in psychiatric and substance abuse facilities. This information would help provide timely access to care and increase coordination between service settings. SB 363 would additionally require this database to include data related to the facility, including if a bed is available, the services provided, diagnoses, and the age range for which the bed is appropriate. | FAILED IN CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE |
SUPPORT |
Assembly Bill 67 | Would create a pilot program for unhoused defendants to participate in diversion programs that would provide housing, mental health services, substance abuse treatment, and more. Would require applicant cities or counties seeking grant funds to provide a number of specified services or program components, including, but not limited to, a diversion program enabling participating defendants to have specified charges dismissed upon completion of a program, provision of temporary, time-limited, or permanent housing during the duration of the program, and a dedicated representative to assist defendants with housing needs. The bill would require an applicant for grant funding under the program to submit a plan for a new homeless court program or expansion of an existing homeless court program, and would require any funding awarded to an applicant to be used in accordance with that plan. | TWO YEAR BILL - WILL BE CONSIDERED NEXT YEAR |
SUPPORT |
Assembly Bill 1708 |
Amends Proposition 47 by requiring a person convicted of theft of a vehicle or firearm, identity theft, or credit card fraud to be charged with a felony. Additionally, the bill authorizes a city or county prosecuting authority or county probation department to create a diversion or deferred entry of judgment program for persons who commit a theft offense or repeat theft offenses, as specified. For those committing theft or repeat theft offenses, a city or county prosecuting authority is authorized to create a diversion program for persons. The bill would provide that it shall become effective only when submitted to, and approved by, the voters of California since Prop. 47 was initially passed by voters in 2014. |
TWO YEAR BILL - WILL BE CONSIDERED NEXT YEAR |
SUPPORT |
Assembly Bill 23 | Amends Proposition 47 by reducing the threshold amount for petty theft and shoplifting from $950 to $400. The bill would provide that it shall become effective only when submitted to, and approved by, the voters of California since Prop. 47 was initially passed by voters in 2014. | TWO YEAR BILL - WILL BE CONSIDERED NEXT YEAR |
SUPPORT |
Assembly Bill 1532 | AB 1532 makes the conversion of office buildings to residential units a streamlined ministerial approval, restricting cities and counties from requiring a conditional use permit, planned unit development permit, or other discretionary local review or approval that would require a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review. Additionally, this bill would exempt an office conversion project from impact fees, as defined, that are not directly related to the conversion of an office building into residential dwelling units. The bill would allow the proponent of an office conversion project to pay applicable impact fees over a 10-year period, subject to specified requirements. | TWO YEAR BILL - WILL BE CONSIDERED NEXT YEAR |
OPPOSE |
Senate Bill 423 | SB 423 removes the sunset clause of January 1, 2026, included in an existing housing provision SB 35, which requires cities and counties to approve specified residential developments through a streamlined and ministerial process, restricting cities and counties from requiring a conditional use permit, planned unit development permit, or other discretionary local review or approval that would require a CEQA review. Additionally, it applies SB 35 provisions to the Coastal Zone, allow the State to approve housing developments on property they own or lease and prohibits a city from enforcing its inclusionary housing ordinance if the income limits are higher than those in SB 35. | SIGNED INTO LAW |
OPPOSE |
Senate Bill 4 | SB 4 requires cities and counties to approve residential developments on property owned by a religious or higher-education institution through a streamlined and ministerial process, restricting cities and counties from requiring a conditional use permit, planned unit development permit, or other discretionary local review or approval that would require a CEQA review. | SIGNED INTO LAW |
OPPOSE |
Assembly Bill 1490 | AB 1490 would require a local government to approve a development proposal for a multifamily housing development project that is an adaptive reuse project and that meets specified affordability and site requirements, including that 100% of the units be made available for lower income households, 50% of which shall be made available to very low income households, pursuant to a streamlined, ministerial review process. In summary, the bill requires all local entitlements and permits to be approved for a project that converts an existing building to a low-income housing development within 30 days from the date the application is submitted, waives all local building and permit fees, and preempts local minimum floor area ratio standards. | SIGNED INTO LAW |
OPPOSE |
Assembly Constitutional Amendment 10 | The California Constitution enumerates various personal rights, including the right to enjoy and defend life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy. This measure would declare that the state recognizes the fundamental human right to adequate housing for everyone in California. ACA 10 states, “declare that the state recognizes the fundamental human right to adequate housing for everyone in California. The measure would make it the shared obligation of state and local jurisdictions to respect, protect, and fulfill this right, by all appropriate means, as specified.” | FAILED IN CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE |
OPPOSE |
State Ballot Initiative No. 21-0042A1 Titled the “Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act” |
The Taxpayer Protection and Government Accountability Act (Attachment #2) would amend the California Constitution with provisions that limit voters’ authority and input, adopt new and stricter rules for raising taxes and fees, and may make it more difficult to impose fines and penalties for violation of state and local laws. The measure puts billions of local government tax and fee revenues at risk statewide with related core public service impacts. The proposed constitutional initiative is sponsored by the California Business Roundtable. Major provisions of the ballot initiative include the following: • Requires voter approval in order to apply an existing local tax to a territory that is annexed; • Prohibits local advisory measures which allow voters to express a preference for how local general tax dollars should be spent;• Retroactively requires all new or increased taxes adopted after January 1, 2022, to include a sunset date; •Requires simple majority approval of the state electorate for all new or increased state taxes; • Prohibits, as a condition of property development or occupancy, a fee regulating vehicle miles traveled; ;• Prohibits local fees for services or permits to exceed the “actual cost” and defines “actual cost,” as the minimum amount necessary; and • May require voter approval of fines and penalties for corporations and property owners that violate state and local laws unless a new, undefined adjudicatory process is used to impose the fines and penalties. |
Qualified for the November 2024 Statewide Ballot |
OPPOSE |
Positions Taken in 2022
Item Topic | Legislative Summary | Status |
City Council Position |
Behavioral Healthcare Package (Senate Bills 929, 965, 970, 1035, 1154, 1227, 1238, and 1416) | Package of legislation that takes a holistic view of the behavioral health continuum and provide increased opportunities and incentives for early intervention and prevention to reduce the negative outcomes with homeless individuals. It also modernizes portions of our treatment system to ensure that those who have fallen through the cracks are able to receive the care that they need to provide for their own needs, safety, and dignity. |
Senate Bill 929 - Signed into Law Senate Bill 965 - Failed in Legislature Senate Bill 970 -Failed in Legislature Senate Bill 1035 -Signed into Law Senate Bill 1154 -Failed in Legislature Senate Bill 1227 -Signed into Law Senate Bill 1238 -Failed in Legislature Senate Bill 1416 -Failed in Legislature |
SUPPORT |
Senate Bill 932 | SB 932 (Portantino) requires every city and county to develop and implement bicycle plans, pedestrian plans, and traffic calming plans, as specified, and provides that failure to implement the plan creates a cause of action for victims of traffic violence. SB 932 will create unfunded mandates for costly improvements to local transportation infrastructure without providing funding for implementation. The bill will also expose many local governments to new legal liability that is likely to result in significant litigation costs to defend and settle. | Signed into Law by Governor | |
Senate Bill 897 | SB 897 (Wieckowski) would significantly amend the statewide standards that apply to locally adopted ordinances concerning the construction of accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Specifically, it increases the height maximum of ADU’s from 16 to 18 feet for parcels with an existing multistory building or 20 feet for a multifamily or single-family parcel located within a half mile of transit. This bill also adds a provision which sets a minimum height requirement of 25 feet for ADUs that are attached to a primary single-family residence which implies that these units will function more as a duplex and not a jr. ADU. As amended, the bill creates a confusing standard and in certain instances would substantially alter the look and feel of a community as SB 897 creates a nuance where ADUs could conceivably be equal in size or larger than the primary residence as it creates a minimum height requirement of 25 feet by permitting ADUs and jr. ADUs to be attached to the primary residence. |
Signed into Law by Governor | |
Senate Bill 6 |
Senate Bill 6 (Caballero) would create a new process allowing residential development on certain commercial, including allowing qualifying projects to use the streamlined application procedures of SB 35 (Wiener, 2017). |
Signed into Law by Governor | |
Assembly Bill 2011 | Assembly Bill (AB) 2011, which would require cities to ministerially approve, without condition or discretion, certain affordable housing and mixed-use housing developments (with certain exceptions) in zones where office, retail, or parking are a principally permitted use regardless of any inconsistency with a local government’s general plan, specific plan, zoning ordinance, or regulation. | Signed into Law by Governor | |
Senate Bill 1338 |
Senate Bill (SB) 1338 would implement and develop the framework for the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court program proposed by Governor Gavin Newsom. CARE Court would require counties to provide comprehensive treatment to the most severely impaired and untreated Californians and hold patients accountable to following their treatment plans. |
Signed into Law by Governor | |
Framework for the Community Assistance, Recovery and Empowerment (CARE) Court Program | As currently proposed, the CARE Court would take place in all California counties’ civil court systems. Individuals could petition the CARE Court on behalf of someone with a severe mental illness and/or substance use disorder who is not receiving the treatment they need. The CARE Court would then conduct an assessment on the individual and place those who are eligible into a court-ordered treatment plan for up to 24 months. | Program in Development by State |
Positions Taken in 2021
Item Topic | Legislative Summary | Status |
City Council Position |
Brand-Huang-Menodza Tripartisan Land Use Initiative | Prepared as a ballot initiative for the November 8, 2022 election, the Initiative is a constitutional amendment that would ensure that all decisions regarding local land use controls, including zoning law and regulations, are made by the affected communities, as opposed to the State. The proponents of the Initiative now have 180 days to collect approximately 1.3 million signatures across the State in order for the Initiative to be placed on the ballot. | Signature Collection | |
Local Control and Authority as it Relates to Land Use, Zoning, and Housing Issues (ACA 7) | To address the detrimental impacts of state housing bills, staff prepared a resolution expressing the City’s intention to support efforts to protect the ability of cities to retain local control over land use, zoning, and housing policies. An example of this is California Constitutional Amendment 7, introduced by Assemblymember Muratsuchi, to specify that local land use regulations would prevail in the event of a conflict with State regulations, allowing local governments to retain their land-use authority. | N/A | |
Senate Bill 9 | Authored by Senator Toni Atkins (D-39-San Diego), Senate Bill 9 preempts certain local land use authority including, zoning, design standards, parking, and overall application standards related to specific residential developments. | Signed into Law by Governor |
August 26, 2021 |
Housing Element Extension | The Housing Element describes the City’s needs, goals, policies, objectives, and programs regarding the preservation, improvement, and development of housing within Manhattan Beach. The Element analyzes community housing needs in terms of affordability, availability, adequacy, and accessibility, and describes the City’s strategy and programs to address those needs. The Housing Element is the City’s response to a growing awareness of the need to provide housing for all economic segments of the community, as well as a legal requirement for all California jurisdictions. It provides Manhattan Beach with the opportunity to plan for the existing and future housing needs in the community. |
N/A |
June 18, 2021
|
Assembly Bill 215 | Authored by Assembly Member David Chiu (D-17-East San Francisco), AB 215 would require the department to determine the relative progress toward meeting regional housing needs of each jurisdiction and council of governments, as specified. | Bill Passed |
June 25, 2021 |
Positions Taken in 2020
Item Topic | Legislative Summary | Status |
City Council Position |
Variances to Public Health Orders | Support for “Safer at Work and Safer in our Communities” Motion by Supervisors Kathryn Barger and Janice Hahn to Allow Cities to Pursue Variance from Public Health Orders | ||
Revision to Public Health Orders | |||
Revision to Public Health Orders | City Request to Eliminate Retail Curbside-Only Restrictions and Allow Manhattan Beach Retail Businesses to Fully Open under State and County Guidelines - Consistent with City Council direction at the May 19, 2020, meeting, the City sent a letter to County Supervisor Janice Hahn and Governor Gavin Newsom to allow our retailers to fully open without curbside only restrictions, while following the State and County safety protocols. | ||
Revision to Public Health Orders | City Requests Additional Public Health Order - Consistent with City Council direction at the April 3, 2020, meeting, the City sent a letter to County Supervisor Janice Hahn, the Board of Supervisors and Mayors of South Bay cities requesting additional public health orders, specifically geared towards construction activities, that go beyond the State’s Orders. See letter here. |
Positions Taken in 2019
Item Topic | Legislative Summary | Status |
City Council Position |
Assembly Bill 68 | Authored by Assembly Member Phil Ting (D-19-San Francisco), Assembly Bill 68, amends regulations regarding Accessory Dwelling Units. In summary, the legislation
would delete the provision authorizing the imposition of standards on lot coverage and prohibit an ordinance from imposing requirements on minimum lot size. |
Bill Passed |
(June 4, 2019) |
Assembly Bill 516 | Authored by Assembly Member David Chiu (D-17-East San Francisco), AB 516 would eliminate the ability for cities to adequately enforce state and local vehicle violations. Specifically, it would eliminate the ability for cities to immobilize vehicles, remove vehicles with expired registrations, and remove vehicles in violation of parking time restrictions. | Placed on Suspense File |
(June 4, 2019) |
Assembly Bill 1356 | Authored by Assembly Member Phil Ting (D-19-San Francisco), Assembly Bill 1356 will, if adopted, preempt local land use authority related to retail commercial cannabis activity. If enacted, Assembly Bill 1356 would require a local jurisdiction in which more than 50 percent of the electorate voted in favor of Proposition 64 (2016) to issue a minimum number of local licenses that authorize adult-use cannabis commercial activity. |
Inactive File |
(May 21, 2019) |
Assembly Bill 1568 | Authored by Assembly Member Kevin McCarty (D-7-Sacramento), Assembly Bill 1568 restricts cities and counties from receiving state grant funds if the city or county has been found to violate state housing laws, such as an inadequate housing element. | Two-Year Bill |
(May 21, 2019) |
Senate Bill 50 | SB 50, introduced by State Senator Wiener (D-11-San Francisco), requires cities and counties to grant an incentive when a development proponent seeks and agrees to construct a residential development that is either a job-rich or transit-rich housing project and meets certain other criteria. The incentives include waivers from maximum controls on density and parking requirements greater than 0.5 parking spots per unit, up to 3 additional incentives or concessions under the Density Bonus Law, and other additional waivers if the residential development is located within one-half mile or one-quarter mile radius of a major transit stop. | Bill Failed |
(March 19, 2019) |
Positions Taken in 2018
Item Topic | Legislative Summary | Status |
City Council Position |
Southern California Edison's 2019 Energy Resource Recovery Account Filing |
Southern California Edison (SCE) submitted their 2019 Energy Resource Recovery Account Filing to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), proposing generation rates for 2019 and new proposed Power Charge Indifference Adjustment (PCIA) rates. SCE proposed to recover part of its projected billion-dollar under-collection for 2018 for losses in the energy market through a one-time increase to the PICA in 2019, resulting in rate increases for Clean Power Alliance members, such as the residents of the City of Manhattan Beach. | Letter Sent |
(December 18, 2018) |
Proposition 6 | An initiative constitutional amendment that eliminates recently enacted road repair and transportation funding by repealing revenues dedicated for those purposes. Additionally, requires any Measure to enact certain vehicle fuel taxes and vehicle fees be submitted to and approved by the Electorate. | Initiative Rejected by Voters |
(October 16, 2018) |
Measure W | If approved by 66.7% of Los Angeles County voters, the Safe Clean Water Program would generate approximately $300 million per year by implementing a special parcel tax of 2.5 cents per square foot of impermeable surface area on private property in the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. |
Measure Passed |
(October 16, 2018) |
Bureau of Cannabis Control Proposed Regulations | Proposed regulations regarding removing cities’ ability to ban cannabis deliveries in their jurisdiction and reducing the time a city has to notify the Bureau about whether a cannabis business licensee has obtained necessary local approvals. |
Adopted and pending Court Action |
(August 21, 2018) |
Energy Upgrade California | Energy Upgrade California (EUC) is a statewide initiative of the California Public Utilities Commission that was created to motivate and educate California residents and small businesses about energy management through useful programs and actions. EUC is committed to ensuring that every Californian is empowered with the tools and information they need to achieve a cleaner, healthier, more energy-efficient and prosperous state. | N/A |
(June 19, 2018) |
Airport Noise |
In January 2018, LAX temporarily closed the south inboard runway through May 11, 2018, for runway reconstruction. During the closure of the south inboard runway, aircraft have used the south outboard runway for both departure and arrival operations causing noise disturbances. |
Letter Sent |
N/A (April 17, 2018) |
Net Neutrality Pledge | In response to the Restoring Internet Freedom Order, various Mayors around the United States took a position and signed pledges. Mayors Bill de Blasio of New York, Ted Wheeler of Portland and Steve Adler of Austin called on all U.S. mayors to join them in a Cities Open Internet Pledge, which required all internet providers with whom they do business to follow a strong set of Net Neutrality principles. | Pledged Support |
N/A (April 17, 2018) |
Assembly Bill 1795 | AB 1795 authorizes local emergency medical services agencies to allow paramedics to transport people to a community care facility, such as a mental health urgent care center or sobering facility. | In committee: Held under submission. |
(March 20, 2018) |
MBUSD Parcel Tax | An annual parcel tax levy of $225 to maintain quality education, keep Manhattan Beach school's among California's best, offset severe state funding shortfalls and provide $2,650,000 to the Manhattan Beach Unified School District |
Measure Passed |
(March 20, 2018) |
Torrance Refinery | Following the U.S. Chemical Safety Board report on the 2015 explosion at the Torrance Refinery, members of the community have advocated for the removal of Modified Hydrofluoric Acid (MHF) from use at the Torrance Refinery and urged the City of Manhattan Beach to weigh in on the issue. | Letter Sent |
ONGOING (March 20, 2018) |
Senate Bill 649 | Authored by State Senator Ben Hueso (D-40-San Diego), Senate Bill (SB) 649 proposed to reduce local control and fees over small cells sitting in the public right-of-way. The bill granted cell providers access to locally owned infrastructure within the public right-of-way and in commercial and industrial zones and prohibited local discretionary zoning review. | Bill Vetoed by Governor |
(July 5, 2017) |
Senate Bill 827 |
Authored by State Senator Scott Wiener (D-11-San Francisco), Senate Bill (SB) 827 exempts certain housing projects from locally developed and adopted height limitations, densities, parking requirements and design review standards. |
Inactive bill and re-introduced as SB 50 |
(February 6, 2018) |
Measure H | The Los Angeles County Plan to Prevent and Combat Homelessness was a ballot measure on the March 7, 2017 ballot sponsored by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. The ballot measure proposed a 10-year, ¼ cent sales tax to help fund housing and support services for the homeless population throughout the County. | Measure Passed | SUPPORT (February 21, 2017) |
Item Topic | Legislative Summary | Status |
City Council Position |
Senate Bill 649 | Authored by State Senator Ben Hueso (D-40-San Diego), Senate Bill (SB) 649 proposed to reduce local control and fees over small cells sitting in the public right-of-way. The bill granted cell providers access to locally owned infrastructure within the public right-of-way and in commercial and industrial zones and prohibited local discretionary zoning review. | Bill Vetoed by Governor |
(July 5, 2017) |
Measure H | The Los Angeles County Plan to Prevent and Combat Homelessness was a ballot measure on the March 7, 2017 ballot sponsored by the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors. The ballot measure proposed a 10-year, ¼ cent sales tax to help fund housing and support services for the homeless population throughout the County. | Measure Passed | SUPPORT (February 21, 2017) |